Arguments for and Against Planning
Presenting this presentation was a bit
daunting as I had been at Uni for less than 3 weeks and a 40 min presentation
seemed long. The topic Arguments for and against planning was a good topic with
a lot of material on it, it’s also very fundamental for the unit as is establishes
the importance of planning.
Content
I think myself and James covered all the
relevant content. The most important of which was the reading for the week "Arguments For and
Against Planning" by
Richard E. Klosterman which James and I covered in immense detail. With only limited
time to prepare James and I thought that to include all the content needed we
should split it up and investigate our own parts although we did continually help
each other out. So it split we James took the Pluralist and Traditional
Arguments and I took the Economic and Marxist Arguments along with the
Introduction and James got the conclusion. Due to the limited information on
two arguments we also decided he should speak about the other arguments for and
against planning we both find.
Introduction
Throughout the introduction I just wanted to outline what myself
and James where going to speak about and the format that the seminar was going
to take.
Economic Argument + Marxist Argument
Had a lot of information in the reading for the week and a lot of
content for me to cover in the seminar. So I started it off by outlining the
history of the economic argument I then split it in to for Parts like in the
reading. At the end of this section I asked the class questions to try and get
them involved then outlined arguments for and against planning outlined in this
section: Economic argument then critically analysed it. The Marxist Argument
took a very similar form except it did not split into four parts.
No comments:
Post a Comment