Although not strictly about urban and regional planning this was a report written for my statistics based unit at University of Canberra. I thought it had some interesting planning aspects so I'm posting it here.
PERCommercialPrecinctReportFinal.pdf
Tuesday, 2 December 2014
Wednesday, 12 November 2014
Importance of Indicators in Strategic Plans
Indicators are an important way of measuring the success of
strategic plans by monitoring the plans priorities and outcomes. It is
important to monitor and measure the success of strategic plans to see if the
goals and outcomes our being achieved and if they are not then changes may need
to be made to actions and/or priorities or the plan may have to be changed in
its entirety. Indicators vary depending on the plan and what they measure. Some
indicators our based on baseline data and therefore are easy to measure for
example foot fall other indicators like quality of life and state of the
environment can be harder to measure although there are models that can be
used.
Plans which focus on easily measurable indicators from baseline data such
as the Queanbeyan CBD Master Plan and to a lesser extent the Canberra City Plan
can lose focus on the community just to deliver these figures to show the
effectiveness of the plan which is not ideal. Although plans which focus on
things harder to measure like Bristol 2020 plan also tread a fine line, being
difficult to measure the effectiveness of the plan. A combination of easily
measurable and more complex indicators help make the best plan. Indicators are
very important because without a way of measuring the success of a strategic
plan it is just an academic exercise.
References
Environment and Sustainable
Development Directorate , 2012. ACT Planning Stratergy , Canberra: ACT
Government.
Environment and Sustainable Development Directorate,
2013. The City Plan, Canberra: ACT Government.
Leyshon Consulting, 2009. Queanbeyan CBD Master
Plan, Sydney: Leyshon Consulting PTY LTD.
McMahon, S. K., 2002. The development of quality
of life indicators—a case study from the City of Bristol, UK, Bristol:
Elsevier.
The Bristol Partnership, n.d. The Bristol 20:20
Plan, Bristol: Synergy Creative.
Friday, 24 October 2014
Importance of Capital Metro - Canberra as a Great Global City
Capital metro is very important much needed piece of
infrastructure although controversial especially if you believe the Canberra
Times. Canberra has always been designed to have rail and the large wide median
strips show this; but this has never happened. Canberra’s reliance on cars
needs to be broken to deal with many issues such as growth in population,
sustainability and higher fuel prices, (ACT Government, 2012) .
The first stage is Gungahlin
to civic is controversial option but really this makes sense because currently
Northbourne avenue is currently a pressure point for public transport, public
transport from civic to Gungahlin doesn’t work, this is because there is no bus
priority along Northbourne, (ACT Government, 2014) . Options to rectify
this are to make the left lane along Northbourne a bus only lane which would congest
traffic further or the light rail. One obvious answer the light rail its good
for Canberra and needed for the future, (Hass, 2014) .
The other thing
building capital metro is facilitating is the Northbourne corridor revamp which
will completely change Canberra’s image for tourists as they drive in from dilapidated
housing commission buildings to nice modern mixed use buildings, more people
and more vibrancy, (ACT Government, Land Development
Agency, 2014)
.
Bibliography
ACT Government,
Land Development Agency, 2014. Northbourne Housing Precinct. [Online]
Available at: http://www.lda.act.gov.au/en/northbourne-avenue-corridor
Available at: http://www.lda.act.gov.au/en/northbourne-avenue-corridor
ACT Government, 2012. Transport for Canberra, Canberra:
Environment and Sustainable Development Directorate.
ACT Government, 2014. Capital Metro. [Online]
Available at: http://www.capitalmetro.act.gov.au/
Available at: http://www.capitalmetro.act.gov.au/
Hass, D. C., 2014. ACT Light Rail. [Online]
Available at: http://www.actlightrail.info/
[Accessed 21 October 2014].
Available at: http://www.actlightrail.info/
[Accessed 21 October 2014].
Wednesday, 1 October 2014
City to the Lake
City to the Lake is Canberra’s largest urban renewal project
if the ACT government gets around to it. It will bring Canberra’s CBD to West
Basin bridging across Parks Way. This Project needs to be done very carefully
and needs to enhance not worsen the aesthetic appeal of Lake Burley Griffin.
While I do believe this project needs to happen I’m not sure now is a suitable
time, not to be to negative but with recent hits to Canberra’s economy and
retail struggling around the city I think adding large new retail spaces just
won’t work.
Increasing Civics population by building high density housing in
the centre of the city as has been seen in New Acton could make this project
more viable in the future. On the positive side this project will deliver much
needed accommodation in the centre of the city and even more importantly
deliver much needed infrastructure, (ACT Government, Environment and Sustainable
Development, 2012) .
Within the City to the lake plan is a new Aquatics Centre, Stadium and land
reserved for a new convention centre.
New Aquatics facilities and a stadium are
desperately needed for Canberra and I would start this project by building the
new aquatics facility and stadium and then re-evaluate the rest of the project
once that is complete, (ACT Government, Environment and Sustainable
Development, 2012) .
References
ACT Government,
Environment and Sustainable Development, 2012. ACT Planning Strategy, Canberra:
ACT Government.
Update
Just updating you all my last post and the next 3 are a part of this semesters assessable
work of 4, 200 words Forum Post spread across the semester. I'm sorry they are brief but I am restricted by the 200 word limit.
Sunday, 7 September 2014
Evaluation Tools and Systems
Accessibility is an vital consideration in urban and
regional planning however it is rarely considered for policy evaluation from
the viewpoint of individuals' quality of life (QoL), (Doi, et al., 2007) . Physical
accessibility can be split into two key categories: transport and Activity.
Transport is simply travel distance, time, cost for various modes of transport,
Activity refers to the amount and location of opportunities, (Doi, et
al., 2007) .
The evaluation of QoL has changed throughout time and has recently been
evaluated as satisfaction/availability of resources, (Doi, et
al., 2007) .
this is no longer an accurate way to evaluate QoL a more comprehensive approach
is needed to understand QoL and how strategic urban planning can enhance QoL, (Khalil, 2012) . Five key aspects
are to be considered when planning these are safety and security, economic opportunity,
service and cultural opportunity and environmental benignity these five areas
can replace Felce and Perry’s five areas of QoL which although were
multidimensional the cannot be easily applied, (Khalil, 2012) . When these Five aspects are applied in
urban planning healthier cities can be created and flow on effects are seen. Using
these aspects in strategic planning helps lead to less inequality, more
recreation, lowing of mental health issues and healthier places to live all
round, (Barton & Tsourou, 2013) .
Bibliography
Barton, H. &
Tsourou, C., 2013. Healthy Urban Planning. 1st ed. Copenhagen: Taylor
and Francis Group.
Doi, K., Kii , M. & Nakanishi, H., 2007. An
integrated evaluation method of accessibility, quality of life, and social
interaction, Toyohashi: published online.
Khalil, H. A., 2012. Enhancing quality of life
through strategic urban planning. 5th ed. Cairo: Cairo University .
Friday, 9 May 2014
Case study 5 Coping with disaster: Victorian Bushfire 2009
The 2009 Victorian bushfires also known as the black Saturday
bushfires were a series of bushfires that ignited on the 7th of February
2009. These bushfires killed 173 people and injured around 414 people, over 3500
structures destroyed mainly houses with over 4billion dollars’ worth of damages.
This day was a perfect day for bushfires with the temperature
peaking in Melbourne at 46.4deggrees (C) and 48.8 degrees (C) and over 115 km/h
wind combined to make some of the worst bushfire weather in Australian history.
The Australian institute of meteorology predicted these conditions well before
they happened they and preparations were made warnings were given the fireman
were ready to fight the blaze and still 173 people died.
The towns of Kinglake, Marysville, Narbethong, Strathewen
and Flowerdale were completely destroyed well many others were severely
damaged. Although this is extremely tragic planning can go a long way to making
sure that something like this won’t happen again. In September 2009 a royal commission
into the Victorian bushfires was called and policy improvements were recommended
and there was a strong focus on buying back properties in extreme danger areas,
wide fire barriers and clearings around roads and property’s.
other recommendations where more back burning, fire trails,
higher fire safety standards for properties (including retrofitting heritage
properties), more fire access roads and improving communications as fire tore
through telephone lines and towers and communications where lost better communications
facilities are needed and more resilient from fire. Another focus was on vulnerable
demographics almost 50% of people who died where over 70 or under 12 more has
to be done to protect these vulnerable members of the community such as making aged
care and child care facilities more fire resistant and in non-fire prone areas.
Thursday, 8 May 2014
Case study 3 Planning for adaptation: Batemans Bay
Batemans bay is a town growing fast and has
many issues and problems to consider which are unique to settlements on the
coast. Batemans bay currently has a population of around 16,000 people which is
expected to increase by around 40% to 23,000 by 2031. Batemans bay has an
ageing and elderly population with 22% of the population over 65 and this
expected to increase over the next 20 years Batemans bay being a desirable
retirement destination for members of Canberra and surrounding areas. For this
reason Eurobodalla Shire Council have brought in an ageing-in-place strategy to
provide planning directions and controls that support
easy-maintenance homes for seniors that are located close to shops and other
services.
Batemans Bay
The growth of Batemans Bay will be achieved through a combination of Greenfield,
urban renewal and infill projects. Two areas were considered for greenfield development
both north of Batemans bay CBD; one in Batemans bay north and the other near Maloney’s
beach after much deliberation and studies the north Batemans bay site was found
to be the best area for greenfield development and Maloney’s beach should not
be used until after the north Batemans bay sit.
new growth areas
Although these Greenfield areas
could accommodate Batemans bays population increase this would not be ideal for
Batemans bay infill will be needed in central areas to keep the population
especially elderly population close to services. Environmental issues also need
to be thought about when planning anywhere but a costal environment is
especially venerable.
elderly infill housing Batemans Bay
Sea level rise is a serious issue that needs to be
planned for with the sea rising an average of 3mm per year, king tides and
heavy rainfall also make flooding a more recent event, planning needs to
consider this and leave barriers and clearings from the ocean and rivers. If planned
well this could save millions of dollars’ worth of damages in the future also Batemans
bay being regional and surrounded by bush land and only with one major access
road bush fires are a serious issue which can be managed via back burning fire
breaks and fire barriers/clearings especially around roads and fire routes.
Wednesday, 23 April 2014
Case Study 2: Melbourne Docklands
Docklands is probably the largest and most economically
significant urban renewal project which has taken place in Australia’s history.
This project has huge implications on Melbourne, Victoria and Australia as it
attempts to attract large national and international business investment. The economic
benefits more then cover the overall expense of this large project; the overall
cost of the project is $12billion and is currently at its halfway point but has
already received $8.5billion of business investment and when complete in 2025
it will accommodate over 50,000 workers. These economic benefits are extremely
important to Melbourne’s economy but a urban renewal project of this size
internationally shows that Australia can be world leaders in innovation to
encourage global investment.
To understand the importance of this urban renewal project
locally we first need to consider the history of this area. Established in 1880
to support ships for incoming immigrants and materials, over years it became a
heavy industrial area to take in materials for Melbourne and Victoria’s trade, construction
and manufacturing industries. Between 1900 and the 1950’s Docklands was the busiest
port in Australia, this was due to both industry and immigration and for this
reason established strong rail links for trade and transport across Melbourne and
Victoria. After the 1950’s docklands trade was redirected to other more accessible
ports in Victoria most notably Geelong and its fate was uncertain all that
remained was an industrial wasteland on Melbourne’s naturally beautiful
waterfront.
In 1991 the Victorian government established the docklands
authority, to plan and develop the docklands area, in 1996 the plans were
drafted and released and the docklands area was split in 7 precincts, in 1997
construction on the stadium commenced and in 2013 the docklands project hit its
halfway point.
Docklands history gives it a special place in the community’s
heart so extensive community consultation was and still is needed for the
correct outcomes for the Melbourne community and heritage plays and important
role to preserve the history of docklands. What was clear from the community consultation
was the community wanted more utilisation of the water front, more greens
spaces and innovative environmental design. This was all considered and is
reflected in the reports released. Docklands is now an area with investor, community
and tourist appeal, all design and construction must fall within ESD guidelines
and the docklands area will be home to 20,000 residents, 700 marinas and over
100 restaurants and cafĂ© to establish a vibrant area on Melbourne’s waterfront.
Sunday, 13 April 2014
Reflection of case study 1: Queanbeyan
Firstly I hope all the people who were at the presentation
enjoyed it, I have to say this was one of the most interesting assignments that
I have had to present. Queanbeyan is a regional city in NSW and has a similar
planning framework as other regional NSW cities of simular sizes however
Queanbeyan has unique concerns and problems due to its proximity to Canberra.
To begin this presentation the process Queanbeyan city council go through in
planning was outlined and a brief history was given then we spoke about new
growth areas of Queanbeyan these are areas of expansion for Queanbeyan these
include south Jerrabomberra, Tralee area and Googong with construction on Stage
1 of Googong well underway.
Then we spoke about the road infrastructure of Queanbeyan
and future roads such as Dunns creek road, Ellerton drive extension and the
northern bypass currently not going ahead and outlined most of the new road
infrastructure and road improvements were being built to facilitate for the new
growth areas. Then we moved on to talk about infill housing and Queanbeyan
having some quite large high and medium density areas due to their proximity to
Canberra and surrounds and also close to Queanbeyan CBD but with this zoning
maps of Queanbeyan where shown and zoning problems where outlined from where
high density and medium density housing areas met industrial areas.
Then we moved on to heritage and this is an important
planning consideration to remain the city’s history but encourage investment,
then transport infrastructure was spoken about focusing on public transport,
walking and cycling and a focus on the car orientated type of city Queanbeyan
is and a lack of public transport integration between Queanbeyan and Canberra.
Finally the economics of Queanbeyan was outlined reviewing Queanbeyan city
council reports, 2006 census and the CBD master plan and critically analysed
the plans for future development and looked at Queanbeyan’s strong
manufacturing and construction industries influence we concluded are speech
with a short video to have a light hearted finish and I hope all who were there
enjoyed.
Friday, 14 March 2014
Planning Systems in Australia (blog 2 2014)
Planning systems in Australia vary depending on state and territory. Every state and territory have their own distinct planning systems and process which are influenced by different things depending on what is significant for that state or territory for this reason I’ll break this blog post into State and territories
ACT
Planning has always been a big part of the ACT Canberra
being a planned Capital as you all know. Planning in Canberra dates back to the
original griffin plan (1911 + 1918) work didn’t really get underway on Griffins
vision till 1927 with the Federal Capital
commission (FCC) and the later the National
Capital Development Commission (NCDC). The Commonwealth government remained
the sole planning Authority over the ACT till it gained self-governance in 1988
and with self-governance came the Australian
Capital Territory’s Land and Management act 1988. This did not mean the ACT
government became the sole body when it comes Planning due to Canberra’s
national commission the NCA would be in charge of planning areas of national
significance and these areas would remain commonwealth land while ACTPLA would
be the planning body in charge of all other areas. Certain areas of Canberra overlap
a good example of this would be Canberra City which is ACT land and also has
national significance in this case both planning bodies preside although the
commonwealth government (NCA) are supposed to get priority. The ACT does have its
own unique advantages in planning as both the ACT Government and Commonwealth
Government own all the Land within the territory this means land ownership
doesn’t become a big issue and all plans can be carried out in their entirety
which has been a problem in other states. This also brings unique challenges as
land sales make up 50% of the ACT governments income this tends to cloud their
judgement in regards to development.
NSW
New South Wales planning system is very similar to that of
all the other states where the state government creates rules and guidelines for
planning and then the local councils are the reasonable bodies for planning and
they work with in these guidelines. This system becomes problematic in a large
city like Sydney where you have 38 local councils which have to work together
for big planning projects they often run into problems and the state government
then steps in to solve these problems. In recent years the State government has
played a larger role in the planning of Sydney to solve this problem.
NT
Northern territory being a territory it is quite similar to
the ACT with the commonwealths sitting above the territory government however
the commonwealth don’t play as big a role as Canberra has more national
significance with all the federal government buildings and national monuments. Also
in the Northern Territory you can own land titles as well as leasing. Northern territory
also has large portions of land which has been given back to the indigenous people
and needs the approval of their elders to be developed, this is normally
granted when royalties have been agreed on.
QLD
Queensland run a similar system to NSW where guidelines are
set out by the state government and then local councils are the planning body
which work within those guidelines. In Brisbane the largest city in Queensland
there is only one large council not lots of small ones like Sydney which solves
the issues which arise when councils have to work together.
SA, TAS, VIC + WA
All share simular planning systems; simular to NSW and QLD
planning systems, but they vary slightly over what they consider significant to
their state for example Tasmania have a strong greens presence in parliament so
preservation of national parks and the environment are key in planning, WA mining
is significant to their economy so it plays a large role in planning and
catering for fly in fly out workers and mining communities. In Victoria it has
a strong rich history so heritage and urban renewal play a large part in
planning along with catering for agriculture which is a large part of Victoria’s
economy. While South Australia has a slightly different planning structure
where the state government are the main planning body and local councils play
more a symbolic role.
Tuesday, 25 February 2014
Best Planners in 19-20th Century - Ebenezer Howard (blog 1 2014)
It is hard
to pick one planner across the 19th and 20th century as there
has been many great planners who in their own way have contributed and changed
planning theory. Ebenezer Howard was one of these great planners although he is
hard to quantify as the best because there are positives and negatives to what
he did however he will be the focus of this blog. Ebenezer Howard is very well known
in the planning profession mainly due to the fact he started the garden city
movement. The garden city movement was very important to planning and changed
the way planners thought about cities; before the garden city movement planning
especially planning in the UK was focused on what it thought was “functionality”
and what functionality basically meant was building a lot of roads and then
dumping high density council housing to accommodate the population. The garden
city moved away from the idea cities just had to house people and created a
community and an aesthetic city people wanted to live in with a lot of trees
and open spaces.
Ebenezer Howard’s
garden city was the first sustainable city model which came about within the
planning profession and now is used a lot when expanding and building new
cities now, combining urban areas with trees and open spaces is essential for
cities to function and we know that thanks to the garden city movement. Many
people miss understand and think the garden city should be low density suburbia
but as mentioned in the video ‘Planning Past and Future: Early 21st Century Reflections’ the garden city is a
medium density urban centre which allows you to walk to the shops and work and combines
community with gardening and farming and becoming fully sustainable. Criticisms
of the garden city would be although it can be adapted to work with the environment
and make a great social community it doesn’t take into account economics and
the productivity of the area things like supporting local business and public
transport, that is reflective of the time but now with globalization and
urbanization these things have to be incorporated.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)